Software development services for systems that can't fail.

Python with Django and Django REST Framework on the backend, React and Next.js on the web, React Native for mobile and AWS underneath - the stack you can inspect in our published case studies like Zeronest. On the energy and IoT side that stack talks to hardware: in Zeronest's case, device-to-cloud communication runs over MQTT and TLS 1.2 behind AWS IoT Core. And when the problem sits lower, we go lower: for RAW Cyber we built a custom Android-based operating system in C and C++, and for Mudita we worked on an OS built on AOSP.

Time and material is the default, and in practice it means monthly invoices with an hour-level report behind them: who worked, on what, for how long. You can cap a month, pause a sprint or change the team size with two weeks' notice. Fixed project fees are possible where the scope is genuinely closed - a migration, an audit, a defined integration.

Yes - redesigns of live products are a large share of our design work. We start with a UX audit of the current product, agree what to keep, and redesign around the users' real tasks. BizBot came to us exactly this way: an existing fintech platform that needed UX solid enough for investors.

A stable group of our engineers who work only on your product, for as long as you need them. Zeronest has been staffed by the same seven-person Order Group team since January 2024 - backend, mobile, QA, analysis and design - working in one- or two-week sprints as if they were in-house. That accumulated context is exactly what disappears when a vendor rotates people, and what you are paying to keep.

Short, fixed sprints with a demo of working software at the end of each one, and a named delivery lead. Deadlines are managed by scope: you always see what fits before the date, and decide what moves.

A working MVP takes from about three months; a full product typically takes 7-9 months. Larger systems ship in phases: a first production release within months, then steady sprint-by-sprint growth. Zeronest is a fair benchmark for the phased path: work started in January 2024 and an early version of the platform was shown publicly at Intersolar Europe that June.

Both, and the process flexes to match. A founder usually starts with a discovery workshop and a three-month MVP; an enterprise more often brings an existing system, a compliance requirement or an integration problem. The team model is the same - what changes is how much of the work is building versus untangling.

Yes - a large part of our portfolio is under NDA, which is why this site names fewer clients than we have. Our default contract assigns all intellectual property - code, designs and documentation - to you.

Yes, and it starts with an audit, not a rewrite. We map the current architecture, stabilize what is fragile, and only then propose a modernization roadmap - because "rebuild everything" is usually the most expensive sentence in software. The first deliverable is a map you can act on: what runs where, what breaks most often, and what it costs to keep each part alive.

Compliance lands in the architecture, in the backlog and in the test plan. In practice that means deciding early where data is processed and who may see it, writing the acceptance criteria as tickets, and keeping an audit trail inside the system. Zeronest is the clearest example on this site: the platform is built to meet NIS2, the EU Cyber Resilience Act and Poland's national cybersecurity act, and client data stays inside the EU. Where a system faces an acceptance authority, as ATOS did in aviation, those criteria shape the plan for every sprint.

After launch the work changes shape: monitoring and error tracking (Sentry, as on Zeronest), fixes, and priorities set from what the monitoring and the support queue actually show. Zeronest has been live since 2024 and still receives new features every sprint - subscription billing and payments arrived in 2026.

Yes. Our default rate model is transparent enough to survive procurement scrutiny: hours, roles and deliverables in writing, with monthly reporting behind every invoice. Ask at the estimate stage and you get client references, the CVs of the people who would actually work on it, and our security and data-processing practices in writing.

Send a short description of the problem - one paragraph is enough - and we come back within 48 hours with an estimate and the questions we need answered. From your side we need three things: access to whoever knows the current system, your non-negotiable constraints, and one person who can make decisions. Constraints usually mean a regulator, a deadline or an existing stack.

We are based in Warsaw, Poland, and have worked worldwide since 2013. Collaboration is mostly remote; we travel when a project needs us in person - for kick-offs, workshops and go-lives at your office.